Me and my man have been going together for a while. We both agreed that we wouldn't have sex yet because we want to build our relationship on love instead of lust.
Recently he said he wanted to go down on me and eat me out. I told him that I wasn't going to go down on him, and he accepted it and said he wanted to do it anyway because he wonders what it's like. I want to know if you think that is fair?? He said it is ok, but I want to know your opinion.
Posts: 62
Registered: 07-04-2004 Location: Rhode Island, USA
posted on 07-30-2004 at 06:01
Perfectly ok. You gave him the rules and he excepted. Now, if he ever comes back to you with the "I did this so you have to do this", remind him of the rules you set down. He can go down on you but you won't go down on him. And he agreed. Don't ever feel like you owe him anything when it comes to sex.
I approve. This is not an act based on lust. This is an aspect of love. He has the respect for you to voice his concerns, to offer himself to you without demand, to seek your needs and pleasures, and to accept the rules you have laid out for your relationship. These rules were made by both of you, and only by both of you can they change... which is exactly what occured. Because he accepted despite your refusal to go down on him leads me to believe he sincerely cares and desires for your pleasure and happiness. Congratulations.
Love is an art, in both the physical and mental aspects. To accept one without the other is the greatest insult one can make. To hold both in tandem, tightly clasped as the lovers they represent, is the greatest compliment.
Divorce reserves the right to block, delete, or edit any and all posts. The Moderator has sole discretion on the content of this site. Anyone who posts accepts these terms, and waives any and
all rights to bring any legal action against Divorce. If you disapprove of any of the above, do not use, read, or post in Divorce
498